The Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2025: A look beyond the scoreboard

The recently concluded Anderson–Tendulkar Trophy between India and England in the summer of 2025 was more than just another chapter in the long rivalry between two of cricket’s greatest Test-playing nations. It wasn’t about who won the toss, who scored how many runs on a given day, or which bowler bagged a five-wicket haul in a particular innings. Instead, this was a series that showcased resilience, revealed vulnerabilities, and highlighted the delicate balance between tradition and transition that both teams are grappling with in this World Test Championship (WTC) cycle.

For India, the 2–2 result was as much a testament to their adaptability as it was a signal of the rebuilding phase they find themselves in. And for England, the series was another reminder of how Bazball can sometimes blaze like wildfire and at other times leave them burnt.

But beyond the scorecards, what does this series really tell us? And what does it mean for the future of Indian Test cricket?

A New Era of Leadership: Shubman Gill’s Coming of Age

India entered this series with a sense of anticipation. For the first time in nearly a decade, their Test team was led not by a Kohli, a Rahane, or a Rohit, but by Shubman Gill, a 25-year-old whose batting elegance had already made him the poster boy of the next generation. Gill’s appointment as captain was not just about transition, it was about sending a message: the Indian Test side was no longer merely inheriting the past, it was beginning to shape its own identity.

And Gill delivered. With 754 runs across the series, including a majestic double century at Edgbaston, he batted with the poise of a veteran but the fearlessness of youth. His innings weren’t just numbers. They were psychological blows to England, particularly when he dug in against Anderson and Tongue under overcast skies.

More importantly, his leadership was calm, calculated, and inclusive. Gill didn’t react in extremes; he allowed bowlers the freedom to set their fields, backed young players even after failures, and exuded quiet confidence. In many ways, his captaincy signaled that India was prepared for a post-Kohli, post-Rohit future, built not on aggression alone but on composure and adaptability.

Siraj, Prasidh, and the Art of Bowling Under Pressure

If Gill was the face of batting resilience, Mohammed Siraj was the heartbeat of India’s bowling attack. With 23 wickets, Siraj not only finished as the leading wicket-taker of the series but also cemented his role as India’s go-to strike bowler overseas. His ability to swing the ball late, combined with the stamina to bowl long spells, often gave India breakthroughs just when England seemed to be running away with the game.

But the real fairy-tale story came at The Oval, in the final Test, when Prasidh Krishna turned what looked like a lost cause into a famous six-run win. His eight wickets in the match, including a decisive burst in the second innings, didn’t just tilt the game but also salvaged India’s WTC campaign. It was the kind of performance that careers are built on, the kind selectors point to when making tough calls for future tours.

The bowling unit’s story was not one of domination throughout the series but of impact in moments that mattered most. It was a reminder that in Test cricket, momentum often hinges not on entire sessions but on passages of play where one bowler, one spell, or even one delivery changes everything.

England’s Fighting Spirit – Woakes and the Culture of Grit

While India’s narrative was one of transition, England’s was of defiance. Nothing epitomized this more than Chris Woakes walking out to bat with a dislocated shoulder in the final Test. This was no less than the equally heroic display by Rishabh Pant in the previous Test, when he came out to bat with a broken foot.

As the crowd cheered for Woakes, commentators gasped, and social media lit up. He didn’t win England the match, but in that single act, Woakes became the face of what makes Test cricket timeless, with a heroic willingness to endure pain for the team and the game.

Bazball, for all its detractors, ensured England never died wondering. Some of their collapses were spectacular, but so were their counterattacks. What England showed India (and indeed the world) is that Test cricket’s charm lies in its unpredictability. One side may appear in control, but two quick wickets or one reckless hour can flip the script.

Turning Points That Defined the Series

Instead of narrating every match, let us reflect on the crucial junctures where the series swung:

• Gill’s 269 at Edgbaston: A captain’s knock that turned a precarious start into a statement innings, demoralizing England’s bowlers.

• Siraj’s spell at Headingley: Breaking the opening partnership on the second morning set the tone for India’s fightback.

• Lower-order resistance at The Oval: Karun Nair’s gritty unbeaten 52 and Washington Sundar’s stubborn defence stretched India’s total just enough for Prasidh to have a target to defend.

• Prasidh Krishna’s 4/24 in the fourth innings at The Oval: The single biggest turning point of the series, sealing a famous victory by six runs.

Each of these moments reminded us that while Bazball thrives on bursts of aggression, India’s brand of resilience and patience can be equally decisive.

The Sai vs Karun Question

Every Test series throws up selection debates, and this one was no different. For India, two names became the subject of heated discussions: Sai Sudharsan and Karun Nair.

Karun Nair: The Veteran’s Second Life

Karun, recalled after nearly a decade in the wilderness, had moments of promise but largely failed to convert starts. His technique against the short ball was repeatedly exposed, and his inability to build on 20s and 30s hurt India at crucial junctures. The lone exception came at The Oval, where his unbeaten 52 gave India a chance. But in international cricket, especially in a packed middle-order race, one innings rarely outweighs six failures.

Sai Sudharsan: The Future Prospect

Sai Sudharsan’s debut wasn’t spectacular, but it was marked by maturity. Scores of 0 and 30 may not stand out, yet his composure, defensive solidity, and willingness to graft were evident. He didn’t look out of place against Anderson or Woakes. That matters. For a 23-year-old, selectors will weigh potential more heavily than immediate returns.

A Broader Bench: Iyer, Easwaran, and Sarfaraz

• Shreyas Iyer, though not in the current Test setup, brings white-ball pedigree but still has technical frailties in red-ball cricket.

• Abhimanyu Easwaran has long been a domestic run-machine and is a steady backup option, though the selectors seem hesitant to give him a long rope.

• Sarfaraz Khan, by contrast, grabbed his opportunity with both hands. His debut innings of 62 and 68* showed intent, confidence, and a refusal to be bogged down. He looked like a player ready for the rigors of Test cricket.

Assessment: Karun’s recall looks more like a stopgap than a long-term solution. Sai and Sarfaraz, on the other hand, represent the future. Easwaran is reliable but unspectacular, while Iyer’s Test credentials remain doubtful until proven.

Impact on the WTC Cycle

The 2–2 draw keeps India alive in the 2025–27 WTC cycle, but the bigger picture is about building a side that can consistently challenge away from home. Here are the key takeaways:

1. Youth at the Core: With Gill, Sai, Sarfaraz, and Prasidh, India has a young nucleus. Their development will define India’s chances in the next two years.

2. Bowling Depth Matters: Injuries to Bumrah or Shami will no longer cripple India if Siraj and Prasidh continue to mature as spearheads.

3. Middle-Order Uncertainty: Until a stable No. 3 and No. 5 are locked in, India will remain vulnerable in seaming conditions. This is where selectors must choose between investing in youth (Sai, Sarfaraz) or leaning on experience (Karun, Iyer).

4. Discipline and Points Penalties: The WTC’s strict over-rate and conduct penalties nearly cost India valuable points in this series. Under Gill, managing game tempo will be as important as winning sessions.

Key takeaways from the series

This series was not just about India or England - it was about the state of Test cricket itself.

• Viewership Spike: Free-to-air broadcasts and viral clips of Woakes batting with one arm and Prasidh’s final burst brought back a sense of romance around Tests.

• Narrative Power: Stories of grit, comeback, and heartbreak resonated far more than any franchise T20 result this year.

• India’s Role: As the biggest market for cricket, India’s commitment to backing youth in Tests, rather than resting stars exclusively for T20Is, will shape how global fans perceive the longest format.

This was not a dead rubber series. It was a live demonstration that Test cricket, when played with intent and storylines, remains unmatched in drama and depth.

The final word

At the end of five gripping Tests, the scoreboard read 2–2. But the real result lies elsewhere:

• Gill emerged not just as a captain but as a leader of a new era.

• Siraj and Prasidh established India’s bowling future.

• Karun Nair’s career hangs in the balance, while Sai Sudharsan and Sarfaraz Khan look poised to inherit the mantle.

• The WTC cycle remains wide open, but India has the raw material to dominate if selections are bold and consistent.

Test cricket is often accused of being too slow for modern tastes, but this series proved the opposite: that no other format can stretch human emotion, resilience, and strategy across five days in such epic proportions. For India, the draw wasn’t a disappointment. It was a stepping stone. The seeds of the future have been sown. And if nurtured well, they could define Indian cricket’s next golden decade.

Jai Ho!

High-handed Ben Stokes shown his rightful place

Dear Ben Stokes, 

After making such a stellar contribution with bat and ball in the fourth Test at Manchester, you served a very important lesson to everyone: One could be his country's captain, one could have performed with the most impressive numbers in batting as well as bowling. But if your conduct reeks of condescension and high-handedness, it lends a very avoidable yet glaring blemish in your otherwise laudable performance during the Test.

I am not here to summarize the scorecard or even the match. Everyone knows the result and everyone would agree that the Indian team earned a very creditable draw, easily coming out of Day 5 as the happier of the two sides.

The critics of Test cricket often argue that it might not be exciting because even after 5 long days of cricket, there might be a draw, which means neither team won. But so what? Isn't life also like that at times? At times, the scales of which of the two sparring opponents has the upper hand are not always unequivocally tilted toward any one specific way. 

Denying a win to your opponent, after what looked like a done-and-dusted content to even the most ardent fans, can be extremely satisfying. Even as good as (if not better than) a win. Just look back at what Ashwin, and Hanuma Vihari did at Sydney in 2021. Or what Gautam Gambhir achieved at Napier in 2009. This was just as much of a great Test match where a draw was achieved by batting to save the match against all odds and when everything seemed like a foregone conclusion and lost long, long ago.

Anyway, Mr. Stokes, I digress. The point is that after another such thrilling encounter between two highly competitive sides, when a draw was clearly on the cards, why did you have to resort to an attitude that does not behove an international cricketer, let alone the captain of his team?

Nobody is contesting the fact that why did you offer a draw? Just as that's very much within the rules, so is the fact that the Indian players were similarly entitled to exercise their choice. How can this everyone-needs-to-bow-down-and-comply-with-my-choice attitude be entertained by any fair person?

"So you want to get your hundred batting against Book?"

No, Jadeja didn't say so, Mr. Stokes. Bring on Carse, Dawson, Archers, Woakes, and you yourself - who's stopping you? Since when did the fact that you didn't want to risk your main bowlers getting injured become your opponent (India's) problems? 

In fact, it was only nice of the Indians to shake hands as soon as both Washy and Jaddu got to their hundreds. I would have loved to see India playing out the full hour. Why not? Isn't it part of the tactics to tire out the opposition, every possible way? You may find that it does not lead to a result but look at it from the Indian team's POV: Isn't tiring your (any) bowlers and keeping your team on the field for that much (read every possible minute) longer worth it? Is it not a good result from an Indian POV? Sure, it might not suit you but again how is that India's problem? This is why the consent of both captains is sought before a mutually agreed draw an hour being scheduled close of play on Day 5. Only and only if BOTH captains agree.

So gulp your grumpy high-handed attitude down your throat and embrace humility. It is only when you give others the respect that they rightfully deserve that you will also get respect in return. Otherwise, all the wonderful numbers and performances you put would come with a disclaimer: Aah, if only he were a nicer and fairer person too, who could have learnt to accept that the world is not here to just comply with him.

Go well and hope to see a better version of you, going forward.

Cheers!

Lessons from the first Test

Ab jo ho gaya, so ho gaya. But it's time to reflect and ensure we identify and learn from our mistakes from this Test to come up with a better result next time.

The first Test between India and England in the Tendulkar–Anderson Trophy offered more than just a contest between bat and ball; it was a lesson-rich chapter for Team India. As the series progresses, let's look at the key takeaways from this match which can be very important for crafting a successful campaign.

1. The Importance of Mental Resilience

One of the biggest takeaways is the significance of mental fortitude. The match illustrated how quickly momentum can shift in Test cricket. England's comeback from a challenging position in the second innings underscored the necessity for India to maintain focus and composure across all sessions.

2. Understanding Conditions Better

While the pitch offered balanced conditions for both batters and bowlers, adapting quickly was key. In the first Test, Joe Root and England's tail adjusted to the pitch by relying more on sweeps and counter-attacks, putting pressure on India's bowlers. The lesson here is for India to read the surface and weather dynamics more astutely and adjust strategies accordingly.

3. Bowling in Partnerships

Effective bowling in partnerships can apply more pressure and create more opportunities. The first Test witnessed moments where India's bowlers, despite starting strong, failed to maintain pressure from both ends. This allowed England's batters like Ollie Pope to settle and build match-defining innings. Building a collaborative approach within the bowling unit can turn the tide in long matches.

4. The Role of Tailenders

With the tail becoming increasingly valuable, ensuring lower-order contributions can no longer be overlooked. In this match, England's tail wagged effectively, adding valuable runs that bolstered their total. Team India needs to focus more on tail-end batting preparation and adopt strategies that enable lower-order resilience.

5. Seizing Opportunities

Dropping crucial catches or failing to utilize moments of vulnerability can prove costly. The match emphasized the necessity of sharp fielding and clinical execution when opportunities arise, as evidenced by a crucial dropped chance that allowed England's batters to extend their innings significantly.

Conclusion

The first Test of the Tendulkar–Anderson Trophy was a reminder that victories are built upon countless moments of discipline, resilience, and teamwork. By focusing on these learnings, Team India can approach the rest of the series with a more robust and refined mindset, ready to rise to the challenge posed by a formidable England side.
Jai Ho!

A tale of two series: From awesome to awful

With due respects to Bangladesh, despite coming off a series win, actually a historic whitewash of Pakistan in Pakistan, beating them in India was more amazing because of how we beat not only them but also the weather gods and won - not because of but in spite of the overhead conditions, especially in Kanpur.

Alas, all that seems a distant memory now, after the whitewash we got - yes, we got whitewashed at home - that too, by a team without any Trent Boult or Kane Williamson, and that had just been walloped 2-0 by Sri Lanka in similar, subcontinental conditions. 

Given the contrasting form and fortunes of both the teams, no one would have expected to see what unfolded in the next fifteen days. 

We all know now what happened. Let's take a look at the possible reasons at the why behind the result:

1. Pitch Conditions and Home Advantage

A critical factor in India's loss was the pitch conditions. Traditionally, India has leveraged spin-friendly pitches to its advantage, banking on its world-class spinners to dominate the opposition. However, in this series, the pitch conditions seemed to have backfired.

Impact of Rank Turners

• Early Wear and Tear: Rank turners deteriorate quickly, leading to unpredictable and uneven bounce. While this theoretically benefits spinners, it also brings opposition spinners into play, neutralizing India's traditional strength.
• Opposition Adaptability: New Zealand spinners, such as Ajaz Patel and Mitchell Santner, adapted brilliantly to these conditions, often outperforming their Indian counterparts and neutralizing the anticipated home advantage India usually enjoys.

Strategic Miscalculations

• Team Selection: India’s selection strategy seemed ill-suited to the conditions. Opting for three spinners on surfaces that offered inconsistent turn meant that the balance of the team was compromised. The reliance on spinners in conditions that didn’t exclusively favor them allowed New Zealand’s seamers to exploit the conditions better.

2. New Zealand's Superior Planning and Execution

New Zealand’s meticulous planning and flawless execution were significant contributors to their series win. From analyzing pitch conditions to understanding player weaknesses, their preparation was thorough and effective.

Tailored Bowling Plans

• Exploiting Indian Weaknesses: New Zealand’s bowlers executed plans that specifically targeted Indian batsmen’s weaknesses. Short-pitched deliveries troubled Indian batsmen, who are traditionally more comfortable against spin.
• Seam and Swing Mastery: On pitches that offered variable bounce, New Zealand's bowlers effectively used seam and swing to their advantage, unsettling the Indian batsmen who struggled to adjust to these variations.

Field Placements and Defensive Strategies

• Aggressive Field Placements: New Zealand captain Tom Latham set aggressive fields that applied constant pressure on the Indian batsmen. The close-in fielders and strategic placements disrupted India's scoring rhythms and induced mistakes.
• Defensive Fortitude: Their defensive strategies, particularly in handling India’s spinners, were exemplary. Batsmen like Rachin Ravindra and Will Young showcased remarkable resilience, playing with soft hands and rotating the strike to negate the spinners' impact.

3. Batting Collapses and Inconsistencies

India’s batting lineup, traditionally a bastion of strength, showed uncharacteristic vulnerabilities throughout the series. Inconsistent performances and batting collapses played a crucial role in the series outcome.

Top Order Failures

• Early Wickets: The Indian top order consistently failed to provide solid starts. Early dismissals of key players like Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill put immense pressure on the middle order.
• Technical Deficiencies: Technical deficiencies, particularly against seam and swing, were exposed. The inability to counter the lateral movement led to frequent dismissals, destabilizing the batting lineup.

Middle Order Struggles

• Inexperienced Middle Order: The middle order, comprising relatively inexperienced players, couldn’t withstand the pressure. The lack of partnerships and frequent wickets in clusters prevented India from posting competitive totals.
• Shot Selection: Poor shot selection at crucial junctures, often precipitated by the pressure of scoreboard stagnation, resulted in quick wickets and furthered the batting woes.

4. Bowling Inefficiencies

While India’s bowling attack is renowned for its potency, several inefficiencies surfaced during the series, undermining their effectiveness.

Inconsistent Spinners

• Lack of Penetration: India's spinners struggled to find consistent penetration on pitches that were expected to favor them. The over-reliance on spin, without adequate support from the pacers, rendered the attack one-dimensional.
• Control and Discipline: Spinners like Ravindra Jadeja and Ravichandran Ashwin were not as effective as usual, often lacking the control and discipline required to tie down the New Zealand batsmen.

Pace Bowling Challenges

• Injury Concerns: Injuries to key pacer Mohammad Shami affected the balance and depth of the bowling attack. Siraj, despite his efforts, was largely ineffective throughout the series.
• Execution Under Pressure: In pressure situations, the Indian pacers failed to execute their plans effectively. The inability to deliver under crunch moments allowed New Zealand to build partnerships and accumulate runs steadily.

5. Psychological Factors and Momentum Shifts

Cricket is as much a mental game as it is a physical one. Psychological factors and momentum shifts played a significant role in determining the series outcome.

Pressure of Expectations

• Home Series Pressure: Playing at home brings immense pressure and expectations. The Indian team seemed to buckle under this pressure, leading to uncharacteristic mistakes and lapses in concentration.
• Mental Fatigue: Continuous cricket, bio-bubbles, and the mental fatigue of a packed calendar seemed to have taken a toll on the players. This was evident in the fielding lapses and moments of indecision during crucial phases of the game.

Momentum and Confidence

• New Zealand’s Confidence: Winning the first Test gave New Zealand the momentum and confidence to dominate the series. They capitalized on this psychological edge, consistently putting India on the back foot.
• Shifting Momentum: Key moments, such as dropped catches and missed run-out opportunities, allowed New Zealand to shift the momentum in their favor. These critical junctures often dictated the overall flow of the matches.

6. Leadership and Tactical Decisions

Leadership and on-field tactical decisions also played a pivotal role in the series outcome. The contrasting captaincy styles of Rohit Sharma and Tom Latham had a discernible impact on the series dynamics.

Tom Latham’s Captaincy

• Strategic Acumen: Latham’s strategic acumen and calm demeanor were crucial in navigating through challenging phases. His ability to inspire and extract the best from his players was evident throughout the series.
• Field Placements and Bowling Changes: Latham’s proactive field placements and timely bowling changes kept the Indian batsmen under constant pressure, often leading to crucial breakthroughs.

Rohit Sharma’s Captaincy

• Aggressive Approach: While Sharma’s aggressive approach is often a strength, it occasionally backfired in this series. Over-attacking fields and frequent bowling changes sometimes allowed the New Zealand batsmen to settle and capitalize on loose deliveries.
• Pressure Management: Sharma’s management of pressure situations could have been better. Instances of frustration and visible agitation on the field might have impacted the team’s overall composure and performance.

Player Availability and Injuries

• Key Absences: The absence of key players due to injuries significantly weakened the team. Missing experienced campaigners like Mohammad Shami and Hardik Pandya deprived India of crucial match-winners.
• Impact of New Zealand's Full Strength: In contrast, New Zealand fielded a full-strength team with all their key players available, giving them a distinct advantage in terms of experience and skill.

Introspect but move on now!

The series loss to New Zealand was a culmination of several factors that collectively tipped the scales against India. From strategic miscalculations and player performances to psychological pressures and external influences, every aspect contributed to the final result. While it is essential to acknowledge New Zealand’s superior planning and execution, it is equally important for India to introspect and address the identified weaknesses. By doing so, India can regain their dominance in future series and continue to uphold their proud cricketing legacy. Let's look ahead now and put our best foot forward in the Tests that await us Down Under. Jai Ho!

Indian cricket: Going from good to great

The recent Test series victory that India secured over Bangladesh stands as a monumental achievement in Indian cricket history. Not only was it a significant step towards our qualification for the World Test Championship (WTC) final, but it also showcased the sheer dominance and resilience of the Indian team in challenging conditions. Let's delve into why this victory was so crucial and special for India.

From the context of the WTC Finals

When this Test series began, India's path to the WTC final was fraught with complexities and challenges. The arithmetic of our win percentage, combined with the permutations and combinations of other teams' schedules and win possibilities, presented a daunting equation. India needed five wins out of the next ten Tests to secure a spot in the WTC final. This included five Tests at home (two against Bangladesh and three against New Zealand) and five away in Australia.

The pressure was immense, as a single loss could significantly jeopardize our chances. The two inaugural wins against Bangladesh, especially the second Test, which was heavily affected by rain and poor drainage, were crucial in ensuring that we could achieve our target of five wins even before embarking on the challenging tour of Australia. These victories provided a much-needed buffer, allowing the team to approach the remaining Tests with a sense of confidence and reduced pressure.

Why this is special

The manner in which India achieved these victories made them truly special. The second Test against Bangladesh was a remarkable display of strategic brilliance and aggressive cricket. In a game heavily marred by weather disruptions, India manufactured a run-scoring blitz that left the cricketing world in awe. Over the course of just 32 overs, India broke four world records for the fastest-ever 50, 100, 150, and 200 in the history of Test cricket. This was a testament to the team's ability to adapt and dominate even in adverse conditions.

The first Test was a showcase of India's bowling prowess. Led by Jasprit Bumrah, Ravichandran Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja, and Mohammed Siraj, the Indian bowling attack dismantled the Bangladeshi batting lineup with precision and skill. Bumrah's lethal pace, Ashwin's cunning variations, Jadeja's all-round brilliance, and Siraj's relentless aggression proved too much for the opposition. In Akash Deep, India found another strong backup, and potentially a contender for a regular spot in certain conditions.

The batting performances were equally commendable. Rohit Sharma's leadership was exceptional, both as a captain and a batsman. His fearless approach and astute field placements set the tone for the team. Alongside him, Yashasvi Jaiswal's incredible batting provided the team with a solid foundation. The first Test also saw a great rescue act from Jadeja and Ashwin, who displayed their batting prowess under pressure.

Breaking records and creating history

The second Test, in particular, was a game for the ages. India's run-scoring blitz not only ensured a victory but also etched their names in the record books. The fastest-ever 50, 100, 150, and 200 in Test cricket were achieved in a span of just two hours, creating complete mayhem for the Bangladeshi bowlers. This aggressive approach was a clear statement of intent, showcasing India's ability to shift gears and dominate the game at will.

Rohit Sharma's captaincy was instrumental in this historic achievement. His fearless approach, combined with brilliant tactical decisions, kept the opposition on the back foot. Rohit's leadership has been a revelation, as he led by example with his batting and inspired the team to push the boundaries of what is possible in Test cricket.

The emergence of new stars

The series also highlighted the emergence of new stars in the Indian team. Akash Deep's performance was a revelation, as he displayed venomous pace and impeccable control. His inclusion added depth to the already formidable Indian bowling attack, providing the team with more options and flexibility.

Yashasvi Jaiswal's batting was another bright spot. His composed and mature approach at the crease, combined with his ability to accelerate when needed, made him a valuable asset to the team. Jaiswal's partnership with Rohit Sharma at the top of the order laid a strong foundation for the team, allowing the middle order to capitalize on the starts.

A team effort

The series victory was a testament to the collective effort of the entire team. From the bowlers who relentlessly hunted down wickets to the batsmen who fearlessly scored runs, every member of the team played a crucial role. The support staff and coaches also deserve credit for their meticulous planning and preparation, which enabled the team to execute their strategies to perfection.

Looking ahead

With these victories, India has positioned itself strongly for the WTC final. The confidence gained from these wins will be invaluable as the team prepares for the challenging tour of Australia. The buffer created by these victories allows the team to approach the remaining Tests with a sense of freedom and confidence, knowing that they have already achieved a significant part of their objective.

The series against Bangladesh has set the stage for what promises to be an exciting and competitive journey towards the WTC final. The team's ability to perform under pressure, adapt to different conditions, and break records bodes well for their future endeavors.

Conclusion

The Test series victory over Bangladesh was crucial and special for India for several reasons. It provided the team with a much-needed buffer in their quest for the WTC final, showcased their ability to dominate and adapt in challenging conditions, and highlighted the emergence of new stars. The collective effort of the entire team, led by the brilliant captaincy of Rohit Sharma, ensured that India not only secured crucial wins but also created history along the way.

As the team looks ahead to the remaining Tests, the confidence gained from these victories will be instrumental in their pursuit of glory in the WTC final. The Indian cricket team's journey is a testament to their resilience, skill, and determination, and the series victory over Bangladesh is a shining example of their excellence in the longest format of the game.

Pakistan cricket: Going from bad to worse

The world of cricket is filled with thrilling stories, unexpected victories, and heart-wrenching losses. The recent two-Test series between Bangladesh and Pakistan is a story that will be etched in the annals of cricket history. Bangladesh, a team often regarded as underdogs, achieved a historic feat by whitewashing Pakistan on their home soil in Test cricket. This victory, however, also casts a spotlight on the consistent downfall of Pakistan cricket, a decline that has been evident since last September's Asia Cup and has now culminated in this series loss.

Bangladesh’s glorious triumph: A new dawn

Bangladesh's triumph in Pakistan is nothing short of historic. For years, Bangladesh has been striving to establish itself as a formidable force in Test cricket. This series victory marks a significant milestone in their journey. The win is not just about the result; it’s about the grit, determination, and resilience that Bangladesh displayed throughout the series.

In the first Test in Rawalpindi, Bangladesh showcased their ability to dig deep and find glory in a time of upheaval. The team was up against a Pakistan side that, despite its recent struggles, still boasted experienced players and the advantage of playing on home turf. However, Bangladesh defied the odds. Their bowlers, led by the fiery pace of Taskin Ahmed and the spin wizardry of Taijul Islam, dismantled Pakistan's batting lineup, while their batsmen put up solid performances that gave them the upper hand.

The second Test in Karachi was the clincher. Bangladesh, having tasted blood in the first Test, went for the kill. The win was comprehensive, with the team dominating in all aspects of the game. Pakistan, on the other hand, looked listless and out of ideas, a shadow of the team that once ruled the cricketing world.

For Bangladesh, this series win is a validation of their hard work over the years. It also sends a strong message to the cricketing world: Bangladesh is no longer a team to be taken lightly. This victory will undoubtedly boost their confidence as they look ahead to future challenges.

Pakistan cricket’s steep decline

While Bangladesh’s victory is a cause for celebration, Pakistan’s performance in the series is a matter of grave concern. The decline in Pakistan cricket has been apparent for some time now, and this series loss is the latest in a series of disappointments.

The downfall began last September during the Asia Cup, where Pakistan, despite being one of the favorites, failed to reach the final. This was followed by a dismal performance in the ODI World Cup, where they were knocked out in the group stage. The T20 World Cup was no better, with Pakistan once again falling short of expectations.

The Test series against Bangladesh has now added another layer to Pakistan's woes. Losing at home to Bangladesh, a team that has traditionally struggled in foreign conditions, is a new low for Pakistan cricket. The series exposed several flaws in the Pakistan team: an inconsistent batting lineup, a bowling attack that lacks bite, and a team culture that seems to be crumbling under pressure.

The first Test in Rawalpindi was a microcosm of Pakistan’s current state. The team failed to capitalize on their home advantage, with their batsmen struggling to put runs on the board and their bowlers unable to contain Bangladesh’s batsmen. The second Test in Karachi was even more alarming, with Pakistan’s performance deteriorating further. The team seemed devoid of any fight or spirit, as Bangladesh outplayed them in every department.

The root causes of Pakistan’s downfall

Pakistan’s decline cannot be attributed to a single factor. Instead, it is the result of several issues that have been festering for some time.

One of the primary reasons is the lack of stability in the team. Over the past year, Pakistan cricket has seen frequent changes in leadership, coaching staff, and team selection. This has created an environment of uncertainty, with players unsure of their roles and positions in the team. The lack of a consistent and clear strategy has also contributed to the team’s poor performances.

Another issue is the lack of investment in domestic cricket. Pakistan’s domestic structure has been criticized for not producing quality players who can perform at the international level. The gap between domestic and international cricket in Pakistan is widening, and the current crop of players is struggling to bridge that gap.

The mental aspect of the game is also a concern for Pakistan. The team has often been criticized for lacking the mental toughness required to succeed at the highest level. This was evident in the recent series against Bangladesh, where Pakistan crumbled under pressure, while Bangladesh thrived.

The road ahead: Can Pakistan rebuild?

The question now is: where does Pakistan cricket go from here? The first step towards rebuilding is acknowledging the issues and addressing them head-on.

Pakistan needs to bring stability to the team. This means appointing a captain and coaching staff who can provide clear direction and strategy. The selectors also need to be consistent in their choices, giving players a fair chance to prove themselves.

Investing in domestic cricket is crucial. Pakistan needs to revamp its domestic structure to produce players who are ready for international cricket. This includes providing better facilities, coaching, and opportunities for young players to develop their skills.

Mental toughness is another area that needs attention. Pakistan’s players need to develop the ability to handle pressure and perform in high-stakes situations. This can be achieved through mental conditioning programs and by playing more high-pressure matches.

Finally, Pakistan cricket needs to rediscover its fighting spirit. The team that once took pride in being unpredictable and resilient has lost its way. Pakistan needs to go back to its roots, playing fearless and aggressive cricket.

Conclusion: A tale of two contrasting teams

The Bangladesh-Pakistan Test series is a tale of two teams heading in opposite directions. For Bangladesh, this series win is a historic achievement that will inspire future generations. For Pakistan, it is a wake-up call that things need to change, and quickly.

As Bangladesh celebrates its victory, Pakistan must take a long, hard look in the mirror. The decline of Pakistan cricket is a sad sight for fans who have witnessed the team’s glorious past. However, with the right steps, there is hope that Pakistan can rebuild and return to its former glory. The journey will be long and challenging, but for a cricket-loving nation like Pakistan, it is a journey worth taking.

India 4 England 1 - Lessons from a riveting Test series

I know this comes rather late since I'm writing my lessons from a Test series that was done and dusted long ago. Yep, a fortnight can be a long time in an Indian cricketer's timeline. In this period, most of the players who were part of that Test team have not only changed their attire and approach as per their respective franchise's team but have also played at least one match of the IPL's latest season.

So let's treat this as a quick sunset/retrospective meeting for the Test series between India and England:

The India vs. England cricket series unfolded as a saga of redemption and resilience, culminating in a resounding 4-1 victory for the home side. After a chastening defeat in the first Test at Hyderabad, Team India staged a remarkable comeback, winning the next four Test matches with authority.

The series, though dominated by India in terms of results, was far from a one-sided affair. England, despite enduring defeats, had its moments, causing some anxious moments for the normally-untroubled home side. Particularly, in the third and fourth Test matches, England showcased glimpses of brilliance, testing India's resolve and resilience.

However, India, despite missing key players like Virat Kohli, Mohammed Shami, KL Rahul, and Rishabh Pant, unearthed new heroes in Dhruv Jurel and Sarfaraz Khan (along with able support from another debutant like Akash Deep). Their contributions, alongside stellar performances from the likes of Yashasvi Jaiswal, Shubman Gill, Rohit Sharma, Kuldeep Yadav, Jasprit Bumrah, R Ashwin, Mohd Siraj, and Ravindra Jadeja, proved crucial at critical junctures of the series.

Despite facing adversity and personnel challenges, Team India exhibited unwavering determination and adaptability, overcoming hurdles to emerge victorious. India found some or the other hero (from the above mentioned list) at key moments to steady their ship and steer them home eventually. The series showcased the depth of talent and the indomitable spirit of Indian cricket, setting the stage for future triumphs and challenges.

Ultimately, the complete lack of adopting sound technique and an abysmal, absolutely 0 defensive approach (at least as a fallback option) cost England dearly. As the cricketing world reflects on the enthralling battles witnessed during the India vs. England series, it is evident that while the scoreline may suggest an absolute annihilation in the latter Tests, the journey was marked by moments of brilliance, resilience, and the relentless pursuit of excellence from both sides.

As the dust settles on this riveting contest, here are some of my takes from the enthralling clashes between these two cricketing giants. Let's unravel the learnings from this captivating series that unfolded on the field of cricketing glory.

1. Adaptability reigns supreme

One of the most prominent takeaways from this series is the importance of adaptability. Both teams showcased remarkable flexibility in their strategies, adapting to various conditions and situations throughout the series. From batting orders to bowling tactics, the ability to adapt was evident in the way both teams approached each game. Whether it was countering spin on turning tracks or facing pace and swing on seamer-friendly pitches, adaptability played a pivotal role in shaping the outcomes of the matches. Still, England's lack of adaptability to good defence and patience, besides not racking up big(ger) scores at an individual as well as team level after getting a good start while batting ended up hurting them bigtime.

2. Spin dominance and subcontinental conditions

The series highlighted the significance of spin bowling in subcontinental conditions. Indian spinners left an indelible mark on the series, bamboozling the English batsmen with their guile and craft. The likes of Ravichandran Ashwin, Kuldeep Yadav, and Ravindra Jadeja spun a web around the English batting lineup, exploiting the turning tracks to perfection. Conversely, England struggled to cope with the spin-friendly conditions, underscoring the importance of adaptability in alien environments.

3. The Battle of the Pacers

While spinners stole the limelight, the fast bowlers also made significant contributions to their respective teams' fortunes. Seamers from both sides showcased their prowess, exploiting the early morning moisture and generating bounce and movement off the pitch. From Jasprit Bumrah's fiery spells to James Anderson's masterful swing bowling, the battle between bat and ball was a sight to behold throughout the series.

4. Batting Resilience and Determination

Amidst the trials and tribulations, batting resilience emerged as a defining trait for both teams. From facing fiery pace attacks to negotiating tricky spin conditions, batsmen displayed grit and determination in their quest for runs. Innings of substance from the likes of Joe Root, Virat Kohli, and Rishabh Pant showcased the importance of temperament and application in the face of adversity.

5. Fielding standards

Fielding standards played a crucial role in shaping the outcome of key moments in the series. Spectacular catches, agile fielding, and sharp run-outs turned the tide in favor of the proactive team on numerous occasions. The emphasis on athleticism and agility in the field served as a testament to the importance of all-round excellence in modern-day cricket.

6. Mental toughness and composure

In the cauldron of high-stakes cricket, mental toughness and composure emerged as invaluable assets for both teams. The ability to stay calm under pressure, bounce back from setbacks, and maintain focus during crucial junctures proved to be decisive factors in determining the outcome of closely contested matches.

Conclusion

As the curtains fall on the India vs. England cricket series, the reverberations of the battles fought on the field continue to echo in the annals of cricketing history. From thrilling encounters to masterful displays of skill and resilience, the series provided a plethora of insights and learnings for players and enthusiasts alike. As we reflect on the lessons gleaned from this enthralling contest, one thing remains abundantly clear – cricket, in all its glory, is a testament to the enduring spirit of sportsmanship, camaraderie, and the pursuit of excellence.

Jaisball 3, Bazball 1

In a series that witnessed thrilling encounters and exceptional performances, the Indian cricket team emerged victorious against England, claiming the series with a commanding scoreline of 3-1. Let's delve into the match reports of the 3rd and 4th Tests to relive the moments that led to India's triumph.

The 3rd Test
India's performance in the 3rd Test was nothing short of dominant, as they secured a resounding 434-run victory, marking one of their biggest wins by runs in Test cricket. The match showcased India's prowess both with the bat and the ball, leaving England struggling to match their intensity.

Led by the impressive batting display of Yashasvi Jaiswal, who crafted a magnificent double-century, India set an imposing target for England. Jaiswal's innings was characterized by aggressive stroke play, including a remarkable hat-trick of sixes off James Anderson. His partnership with debutant Sarfaraz Khan further demoralized the English bowling attack, as they piled on the runs with authority.

On the bowling front, Kuldeep Yadav's brilliance added to England's woes, as he troubled their batsmen with his spin and guile. Supported by the likes of Jasprit Bumrah and Ravindra Jadeja, India's bowlers dismantled the English batting lineup, restricting them to a paltry total.

The victory not only showcased India's depth and talent but also reinstated their dominance in home conditions, sending a strong message to their opponents.

Test# 4

In the 4th Test, India faced a challenging chase but displayed steely resolve to overcome England's threat and seal the series win. Despite encountering a wobble in their chase, losing five wickets for 36 runs, India's sixth-wicket pair of Shubman Gill and Dhruv Jurel showcased resilience and composure to guide their team to victory.

The match witnessed some gripping moments, with England's spinners posing a threat to India's chase. However, Gill and Jurel stood firm, weathering the storm and guiding their team closer to the target with each passing over.

Jurel's contribution in both innings proved pivotal to India's success, as he displayed maturity beyond his experience, anchoring the innings when it mattered the most. Gill, on the other hand, exhibited his class with a composed innings, steering India towards victory with calculated aggression.

Despite England's valiant effort, India's proven record at home and their determined pursuit of the target ensured they emerged triumphant once again.

A Test Series to remember

India's series win over England epitomizes their dominance and resilience in Test cricket. From commanding victories to gritty performances under pressure, the series showcased the depth of talent within the Indian team.

As they celebrate this well-deserved triumph, India will look to build on this success and continue their winning momentum in future encounters. For now, they can bask in the glory of a series well won, reaffirming their status as a force to be reckoned with in the world of cricket.
Jai Ho!

Haara wahi, jo ladaa nahin

It's been a rough start to the first Home Test of the year.

We have lost to Bazball-fueled English side in another tough-to-swallow defeat and some analysis and lessons are in order.

In a stunning turn of events at Hyderabad, England orchestrated one of their greatest Test victories against India, defying all odds and expectations. Falling behind by a massive 190 runs in the first innings, a deficit never before overturned by a visiting team in India, England emerged triumphant in the face of adversity. This victory, undoubtedly, will be etched in the annals of cricket history as a testament to the resilience and determination displayed by the English side.

Ollie Pope's Sweep-Filled Masterclass

The heroics of Ollie Pope stole the show in England's second innings, where he played a pivotal role in turning the game on its head. Scoring a sensational 196 runs, Pope's innings was a masterclass in the art of sweeps, reverse sweeps, and even the audacious reverse Dilscoop. His ability to disrupt the lengths of the Indian spinners left them searching for answers. Pope's fearless approach, reminiscent of Dinesh Chandimal's iconic innings in Galle in 2015, paved the way for England's historic comeback.

Tom Hartley's Debut Brilliance

Debutant left-arm spinner Tom Hartley became an unlikely hero for England, despite a challenging start in his first Test over. Hit for two sixes in his debut over and with a costly analysis in the first innings, Hartley bounced back with a remarkable seven-wicket haul in the second innings. His ability to find the right length and capitalize on the weaknesses of the Indian batsmen showcased the depth and resilience of the English bowling attack.

India's Top-Order Struggles

While England's comeback was remarkable, India's top-order batting struggles played a significant role in their defeat. Rohit Sharma's 39 was the highest score in India's second innings, highlighting the inability of the top order to anchor the chase. The lack of natural sweepers in the Indian lineup became apparent, as the spinners from England capitalized on this weakness.

Ben Stokes' Captaincy and Bowling Brilliance

Ben Stokes, captaining with flair, demonstrated astute leadership in both innings. In the first innings, his attacking captaincy aimed to buy wickets, setting the tone for England's fightback. In the fourth innings, he relied on conventional methods, attacking with the ball while defending with strategic field placements. Stokes' approach, combined with effective bowling from Jack Leach and Hartley, played a crucial role in dismantling India's batting lineup.

England's Bowling Strategy and Adaptability

England's bowlers, led by Jasprit Bumrah, showcased adaptability and strategic brilliance. Despite an injury to experienced spinner Jack Leach and initial struggles of debutant Hartley, the bowlers adapted to the conditions and exploited the weaknesses of the Indian batsmen. England's ability to control the lengths and maintain pressure in the crucial moments of the game proved to be a game-changer.

Final thoughts

England's triumph in the first Test match against India at Hyderabad will be remembered as one of the most remarkable turnarounds in Test cricket history. Ollie Pope's heroic innings, Tom Hartley's debut brilliance, and the strategic captaincy of Ben Stokes were pivotal in overcoming the daunting challenge posed by the Indian team. As both teams gear up for the next encounters in the series, the lessons learned from this epic clash will undoubtedly shape the narrative of the battles to come.

Despite this setback, I'm sure Team India will fight back and come hard.

Khelenge behtar, aur jeetenge bhi..

Kyunki haara wahi, jo ladaa nahin!

Well done, Broadie!

Stuart Broad has announced that he will retire from all forms of cricket in the middle of the current (and final) Ashes Test of this series. 

Irrevocably in the hallowed 600+ Test wickets club, Broad will obviously be remembered as one of the highest wicket takers, especially from this era. For someone who had also batted in the lower "lower order" - a euphemism for #11) - Broad was also a handy batsman more than capable of tonking a few on his day.

But apart from every other ability and achievement, if you ask most Indians about their first memory of Stuart Broad, they would hark back to that over of the 2007 T20 World Cup where a certain Mr. Yuvraj Singh took him apart (thanks to a certain Mr. Flintoff too).

In fact, this is why I am writing this article. There he was, in an abyss in 2007, who (that too in international cricket and in a World Cup match nonetheless) had just been clobbered for 6 consecutive sixes in his over. 

Even a couple of years later and another World Cup match - this time the stage was the 2009 T20 World Cup where one saw a huge upset: England lost to unfancied Netherlands. They could have won it even till the last ball of the last over, being bowled by guess who - yeah, Broadie!

2 runs were required off one ball. Broadie bowled the last ball, which was hit back at him in his follow-through. He collected the ball and as the batsmen expectedly scampered, he had all three stumps at his end to aim at. A run out could have ensured an England win by 1 run. But his throw was not just off target but even resulted in an overthrow, which meant Netherlands had beated England on the day. Stuart-distraught-Broad.

Now, as we reflect on a glittering career, why have I highlighted these two incidents? No not to cherry-pick some of his lows and mock him. In fact, to share and learn from what one can achieve even from ostensibly a black hole.

Broad is a shining example of tenacity and perseverance. He has taught us that there's no low cannot be surmounted. To borrow the words of that peerless gem, that living legend called Sachin Tendulkar: People (or life) can throw stones at you, you can still turn them into milestones.

Just imagine the mental state of Broadie, after that over in the 2007 T20 World Cup. 

Or even after missing that throw, which changed the equation from a potential win to a loss (and a momumental upset).

How dejected and heartbroken he must have been. Imagine being in such a situation within two years. He could have collapsed and fallen into an abyss of uninsipiring performances, eventually evanescing into a forgettable career.

Yet, he rose. Like a phoenix from the ashes, from Ashes to Ashes! After all, if you have played non-stop for 14 years (since 2009) in every home Test of the Ashes, you must be doing something right!

600+ Test wickets later, we are looking at a legend of the game. What we must never forget though, is that those two nights could have defined his career, even obliterated it. But it did not happen and thank God it did not happen. So that we could see a living tale pan out of someone who did not get bogged down by the worst lows that life can present.

Thankyou Stuart Broad, for not just a great career but also a great life lesson. 

Fare thee well!

Thank you, Test Cricket!

And so, the World Test Championship Final ran its course, with India ending up as the runner-up once again. While it was toughest to swallow the almost no-content and abject, meek surrender by the team, in a way it felt good to see that this defeat would perhaps invoke some wake-up calls to the team, to make sure that they treat the best form of cricket in exactly the way it deserves to be treated - in the best way possible. Still not sure why? Here's a quick overview of why Tests are at an altogether level

Test cricket is often considered the most riveting sport due to several unique characteristics and factors that set it apart from other formats of the game. Here are some reasons why Test cricket is often regarded as an enthralling and captivating sport:

Test of Skill, Technique, and Endurance: Test matches are played over five days, allowing for an in-depth examination of players' skills, technique, and mental resilience. Batsmen have to face numerous deliveries, bowlers strive for consistency, and fielders need to maintain focus for long periods. The extended duration of Test matches creates an intense battle that requires physical and mental endurance from all participants.

Strategic Battles: Test cricket is a strategic game that involves captains and players making decisions over extended periods. The ebb and flow of the game often lead to intense tactical battles, where captains use their expertise to set attacking or defensive fields, devise plans to dismiss batsmen, and manage resources effectively. These strategic maneuvers add layers of complexity and excitement to the sport.

Test of Patience and Concentration: Unlike limited-overs formats, Test cricket demands immense patience and concentration from both batsmen and bowlers. Batsmen must be disciplined to spend long hours at the crease, carefully selecting shots and resisting the temptation to play rashly. Bowlers must maintain accuracy and consistently test the batsmen's skills. The mental challenge of sustaining focus and making the right decisions throughout the match is a captivating aspect of Test cricket.

Tactical Battle Between Bat and Ball: Test cricket offers a fascinating contest between bat and ball. Bowlers strategize to exploit weaknesses and dismiss batsmen, while batsmen aim to counter with solid defensive techniques and find scoring opportunities. The fluctuating balance of power between the two adds an element of uncertainty and suspense to the game.

Changing Pitch and Weather Conditions: Test matches can span different days, allowing the pitch and weather conditions to evolve. The pitch may deteriorate, making it more challenging for batsmen as the match progresses. Weather conditions such as swing-friendly overcast skies or turning tracks can significantly impact the outcome. These ever-changing variables make Test cricket unpredictable and captivating.

Historic Rivalries and Iconic Moments: Test cricket has a rich history and is associated with iconic rivalries and memorable moments. From the Ashes battles between England and Australia to the fierce encounters between India and Pakistan, these historic rivalries evoke intense passion among fans. Test matches have witnessed legendary performances, thrilling comebacks, and nail-biting finishes that have become etched in cricket folklore.

Narrative Building and Test Series: Test cricket unfolds over a series of matches, allowing narratives to develop and rivalries to intensify. The outcome of a single match may contribute to a larger story arc, adding anticipation and significance to subsequent games. This narrative building enhances the overall drama and excitement of Test series.

In conclusion, Test cricket's longer duration, strategic battles, mental challenges, and historic rivalries contribute to its reputation as the most riveting form of the sport. The combination of skill, endurance, patience, and fluctuating dynamics makes Test matches a captivating spectacle for cricket enthusiasts around the world.
Once again, congrats Team Australia and looking forward to a resurgent performance from Team India in Tests too, coming up soon, in West Indies!

After two of the four Tests in the Border Gavaskar Trophy 2023 in India, the hosts have taken an unassailable lead. Having been winners from the previous edition, Team India will retain the trophy even if the Aussies manage to draw the series by winning the next two matches.

But even that looks a distant dream as of now and the most immediate priority for them, even if it might seem only theoretical, is to avoid losing a place in the WTC Final. If Pat Cummins and his men get whitewashed AND if (okay, even if it's a biiig IF..) ..if Sri Lanka can blank out New Zealand on their home turf 2-0, it could well be an India Sri Lanka final. But realistically, the odds of that happening are nearly as much as those of having no rains for a whole week in England.

Nevertheless, the Australians take a lot of pride in their Baggy Green and must be hurting after their disappointing outings in the first couple of matches. Especially in Delhi, where they ceded ground rather abjectly from a position of strength on two key occasions - first, while bowling when they couldn't break through Ashwin and Axar's partnership and only just got a lead by the most slender margin possible. And then, after still ending that day with a wonderful start to their second innings, they frittered away another commanding position by committing harakiri and collapsing within a session the next morning, most dramatically and mindlessly.

Don't go by the scoreline, the series has had riveting moments of quality cricket and intense competition. It's just that these moments have not been enough for any cricket fan's liking and have often been punctuated by poor cricket by the Aussies.

As the caravan heads to Indore, let's hope for some tough cricket and an even better contest in the next two Tests, as a dress rehearsal (albeit in vastly different conditions) for the WTC final at Lord's. Coming soon, this June. Jai Ho!

Another day, another year

Happy new year and all that!

As we say hello to a new year (still new, at least for this blog posting its first article of 2022), it's probably a good time to reflect a bit.

Pretty much a year ago, India registered an unforgettable victory on Australian soil, on January 19, 2021. It was the second consecutive Test series victory by an Indian team, beating Australia IN Australia for two consecutive tours (2018-19 and 2020-21).

How time turns. Ironically, two gentlemen who were the heroes this time last year - Cheteshwar Pujara (as the gritty, blow-bearing, un-outable, un-dismissable batsman who won us the Gabba match and pretty much the series too) and Ajinkya Rahane (the stand-in captain for the series after Virat Kohli's paternity leave after the infamous 36 all out first Test) were being rightly feted, glorified, and hero-worshipped.

Cut to circa 2022. Twelve months and many cheap dismissals later, as India lost a very winnable series against South Africa today, they are now the most maligned, most targeted and most blamed villains of the day. While one mustn't forget their contribution and grace for the most part, and extreme reactions are still avoidable, it must be said that they have been given enough of a long rope now.

So much so, that the long rope has now become a noose around their necks. While they must be the first ones to acknowledge and improve on their lack of contributions and might still have time for a comeback, on the evidence of the last 12 months, they need to make their performances talk and begin with the domestic circuit now. If they still bang the door hard enough with their runs, they can always come right back in but for now, that'll be all.

Barring an odd performance here and there, the last 12 months have not shown any semblance of consistency and assuredness that have been their USPs over all these years. Remember the time we were blanked out in Australia in 2011-12? We revamped our Fab Four after that, bringing in a generational shift. 

This loss, against a South African side, who we could have beaten quite easily, will hurt for a long time. It comes against a team that is inexperienced and probably the weakest Protean starting lineup that we have faced on their soil, till now. Not taking any credit away from the magnificent Rabada, the inspirational and gritty Elgar, precocious Petersen, and Jansen, their new sensation. The grit, skills, temperament and talent of this SA lineup compensated for the lack of enough experience or "big name"/marquee players.

But all said and done, the way we began, we could have still won the series from the points where we had been in the match. For both the losses, we have to look at our batting as the biggest bugbear. A failure to capitalize on 50-50 situations, sometimes collapsing even after dominant positions and the lack of those consistent partnerships and daddy hundreds hurt us bigtime. After all, you cannot ask your bowlers (especially fast bowlers) to keep galloping in, session after session, innings after innings, match after match.

Tough luck at times but we were very under-par and need some tough calls now.

It's time to bring the Viharis, Iyers and Gills of Gen 2.0 and start afresh. With Rahul as coach and guys like Kohli, Rohit, Jadeja, Ashwin, Shami, Bumrah, and Rahul, there's no dearth of experience or quality either. Only a matter of time before we hit our straps and make every match count and every moment count.

Hope to see Gen 2.0 in our playing XI. Now. High time.

Only then can we say that we are on course for a truly happy, a truly "new" year.

Jai Ho!

Decoding batsmen, the Ashwin way

He has always been a fierce competitor and a great bowler, easily one of the most accomplished and consistent match-winners from his generation/era of cricketers. But what really goes behind making Ravichandran Ashwin all that and more?

I recently read his insightful and absorbing interview with one of my favorite cricket journalists, Sidharth Monga. Needless to say, this conversation is a treat for cricket lovers, especially bowlers, on how a thinking cricketer goes about his plans. The countless hours behind what seems a moment's magic, the mental/tactical preparations, the importance of self-belief, honest analysis and conversations, and the insurmountable passion which fuels the desire to rise like a phoenix after ever trough.

Research and preparation

Take, for example, this statement, which stems from his research and analysis on batsmen:

Here he is on Steve Smith, before India's tour of Australia in 2020-21:
"I made him my obsession for about six months, not just two weeks or three weeks. Just footage, just watching different matches....with Steve Smith, his batting is very momentum-driven. Most of his batting comes from his hands, so my whole idea was to disturb his hands through the series. He's got certain hand-movement patterns. You have to pick them and be able to bowl in a way that disturbs his hand pattern. So I bowled with different load-ups, different speeds, different run-ups and all that. I realised I kind of got to him."

And this is on Joe Root, just before England's India tour in February 2021:

"Joe Root will not block two balls in a row. He's got a slightly vulnerable defence. And I think he knows that. Or he's constantly on the move. So every time he defends a ball comfortably outside off, the next ball will be a sweep."

Self-awareness

"I am at that stage of my career where I have no time for external noise. I just want to play cricket. The one thing I needed to figure out was: why was my mind wanting to give up? Why did I want to quit? I was not enjoying the game. Why? Because the factors were all external. If I turned my attention inwards, I could enjoy the game. All I needed to accept was, whatever happens, if I am in the team, if I am not in the team, if I perform, if I don't perform, it will be on my terms."

Objective and honest

"...if I have to come and partake in his (Kuldeep Yadav getting a five-for) happiness, and the success of the team, I must feel like I belong there. If I feel like I am being thrown under the bus, how am I supposed to get up and come for a party to enjoy the team's or team-mate's success?"

Way to go, R Ashwin. Every time you read about him, his mental strength, passion, preparation, and intelligence always stand out. There's a lot of talk about him trying to be oversmart or unsportsmanlike but one conversation with him and you'll know why all that is all bunkum.

You are a true champion, Ashwin - may you and the likes of you keep exceling and keep prospering. PS: Likewise for writers like Sidharth. 

Can't wait to catch all the action from South Africa!

Jai Ho!

Hello, Test Cricket!

I write this at the end of the first Test match between India and New Zealand if you've seen the match, you know what an engrossing day of cricket we saw. After the T20 razzmatazz where the skill sets required succeed are entirely different, Test matches tell you just why every cricketer worth his/her salt would love to do well the most in that format. 

Sample this:

On the last day of the match, NZ began the day needing 280 more runs from 93 overs, with 9 wickets in hand.

At lunch, night watchman William Somerville and Tom Latham had remained unseparated, in a wicketless first session, leaving all 4 results open to possibility. And then the game ebbed and flowed, with India capturing 3 wickets post-lunch, and 5 in the next one. Yes, we were still agonizingly short by just one wicket in a last-wicket unbroken stand between the very impressive Rachin Ravindra and the gritty Ajaz Patel. 

Right from when they came together in the 90th over (at 89.3 overs) till the end of the day at 98 overs, their thrilling partnership during the course of those 51 balls is precisely why nothing can ever beat Test Match cricket.

Gripping, sensational and as many in NZ would call it, even an absolute heist. The duo did got the Kiwis out of jail.

I have often seen people ask in wonder, "Why is it that Test cricket has a draw? Why can't there be a result? Isn't it boring (even bad) to play for 5 days and not have a result at the end of the match?"

Well, to all those who think so, the next time your mind drifts to think along those lines, remember what happened today. It was a draw alright, but ask anyone who watched, from either side, every ball, especially the last hour and even more so, the last half-hour (the last 7-8 overs) was simply mesmerizing.

Thank you, Shreyas Iyer, Tom Latham, Ravichandran Ashwin, and Kyle Jamieson for playing your heart out in your all-round performances in each innings.

Dream debuts for Shreyas Iyer and Rachin Ravindra - well done and hopefully, this is only the beginning of many more memorable moments for both of you..

And most importantly, great advertisement for Test Cricket.

Yes, India might not have won today but that's why this sport (and even more so, this format) is a lot of like life. You might not win today but you can still salvage and walk with your head held high, and live to fight and win another day.

Can't wait for Mumbai, the next stop.

Long Live, Test Cricket, Jai Ho!

Lords of Lord's!

"If you go after one of our guys, you are going after the whole team, all XI of us will come right back.”

Some things stay etched in your memory forever and if you had to find a one-line summary of what Team India is all about, you need not go any further than this statement from KL Rahul at the end of the Lord's Test.

To win a Test match is one thing and a great joy in itself. For any team from the subcontinent, winning in one of the SENA countries is quite another. 

But to win from a precarious position when, by the end of the first hour on Day 5 as Rishabh Pant got dismissed for not very much, Indian fans would have been hoping that we do not lose the match.

From there, when a draw would have looked as if God had answered our prayers, to in fact winning the match quite dramatically and dominantly, it was just surreal, amazing, and most pleasing. 

The entire Anderson-Bumrah-Buttler episode seemed to have galvanized our tailenders, (correction: accomplished lower order batsmen) as Messrs Mohammad Shami and Jasprit Bumrah pulled off an absolute batting heist against the hapless English bowlers who had no clue what had hit them.

From defending and tuk-tukking the match, to actually getting to a position, we ended up declaring (by many accounts, even the declaration could have been timed earlier). Says a lot about how radically that partnership transformed the entire match. And then, the way we bowled our heart out to dismiss the Englishmen well within the 60 overs on the final day. If this is not awesomeness, I don't know what else is.

Well done, Team India and keep shining, always.

Jai Ho!

In defence of the defender

Just a few weeks after the disappointing end to the WTC final, Indian cricket is in the midst of some very avoidable confusion and uncertainty about a few things:

After Shubman Gill's shin injury ruled him out of the England series, the Indian squad in England asked the selectors to send two replacements for the series - one for Gill and another backup batsman - so that in the event of any first-choice batsman's injury on this long tour, calling for a replacement would be no good due to 14-day quarantine requirements. Both valid and proactive requests.

But as I write this, there has been no official response from the selectors and not even a communication to carry on with the standby players in the squad. Quite needless and avoidable. At least the team management has the right to get the team strength it is looking for. If nothing else, knowing who all are to be considered (and who not) will give them the necessary clarity on proceeding and planning accordingly.

And abhi toh I'm not even getting into why the much experienced and much more in-form Prithvi Shaw is not being preferred over Abhimanyu Easwaran for England. If the team management wants him to be in England instead of SL post-Gill, why not and why wait? You could always keep Easwaran in the standbys but fly Shaw to England well in time and prefer him over Easwaran any day. What's wrong in that? 

As for the SL team, we can have replace Shaw with Sheldon Jackson in the team for SL. Sheldon was already unlucky not to have made the cut in any of the teams, despite being a consistently heavy scorer in domestic cricket. Blessing in disguise too.

Anyway, I'm just another fan and for whatever it is worth and howsoever strongly I believe these to be the right decisions, these are after all, just my thoughts.

Onto the next and even bigger point:

It's about a certain Cheteshwar Pujara.

Now, I know human memory can be short and fickle. But to banish or overlook someone's historic performances (in general) and barely a few months ago in particular, is truly next level stuff.

Image Credit: Ashish Magotra, Scroll (https://s01.sgp1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/article/153679-ncwqqblsnv-1611228214.jpg) 

Imagine this: 

Just a few months ago, at the start of the year, he was the toast of the town, having done what very few #3 batsmen can claim to have achieved: playing (AND ARCHITECTING SERIES WINS) as #3 batsman on consecutive tours to Australia.

Beating Australia in Australia on consecutive tours.

Being the architect of both those series wins at the crucial #3 spot on both tours.

How many batsmen do you know who could achieve this?

Yet, in just a few months, he is now battling for a place in the side?!

Sure, he gets stuck and not that it is something he shouldn't work on, but it's not entirely unexpected of him either. Honestly, he just needs to get out of the belief that he needs to only defend the ball initially. And in any case, he does accelerate well after reaching 100 - but of course, that hasn't happened enough in the last few months but so what?

He was not hitting hundreds in Australia in 2020-21 but go ask any Aussie bowler whose sight repulsed them the most, and they'll name Pujara.

As with any other batsman, Pujara is also not perfect. Sure, he needs to keep the scoreboard ticking too and not play out only maidens all the time. We can ask him to avoid stonewalling and deadbatting all the time, alright. Continue with it 90% of the time but at least try 5-10% more because you know you have Puji for that role - to hold one end up, and let others play around him. And that's it.

That's Pujara's only fault - of not scoring quickly enough - but should we just drop him for that?

Why are not considering all the other qualities he brings to the table?

And by the way, if not attacking enough is a yardstick for Pujara, shouldn't the same yardstick (like not defending at all or not defending well enough) be applied to our other batsmen, including the captain?

Is it only Pujara's failure?

If not, why should only he pay the price?

His solidity, his doggedness, his resolute defence and his determination. He hardly gets out to loose shots but only to good balls. Yes, he can show more intent but that does not mean he should be dumped from the team. It's a message that can still be given more subtly without dumping a player of his stature.

The great Mr. Sunil Gavaskar also made the valid point of Kane Williamson also batting so slowly in the same match. Yes, he did accelerate too. But the point is that others around him batted well too and he also opened up later. For India, hardly anyone flowered in our innings. So defence is not the issue. It's just that he is not scoring enough, which can still be sorted out.

Facing a barrage of bouncers, short stuff, abuse/sledging/mental disintegration/call-it-what-you-will, snorting jaffas and what not, but never losing composure, and coming up trumps, time and time again. 

Eating up time and balls to tire the bowlers down and bring the opposition on its knees.

Now then, show me how many batsmen can claim to match Pujara for all such traits.

Anyway, of course, these are just my thoughts, for whatever they are worth. But for someone who has stood up for the team time and time again, been a big reason for some of our most memorable wins, and remained an unsung hero without too much fanfare. 

If nothing else, you deserve a lot of fans batting for you and defending you this time, Puji. We know that more than anyone else, you yourself are hurting from the lack of runs and want to turn the corner and improve the scoring rate too - anything that helps the team. Keep the faith, good luck, may sanity prevail and may you be back in favor and among runs soon!

Haan thoda dard hua, par chalta hai..

Yes, it is heartbreaking.

Yes, another session of batting, even another 50-60 runs or so, and we should have been able to at least draw the match and share the trophy.

Yes, it hurts even more when you realize that our team came so close and yet, was so far.

But then, you see who you lost to.

You see who played better cricket over the entire length of the match.

You see how we still lost to a team that is truly THE most liked team for its conduct..

Haan thoda dard hua, par chalta hai.

And of course, you see this and it feels like the same wind is now blowing a lot better suddenly:

Yes, the world is a better place because of good, genuine people.

I'm pretty sure that both Virat Kohli and Kane Williamson are thorough gentlemen off-the-field.

It's just that when it comes to Kane, one can say that about him on-field too.

As regards Virat, for all the histrionics, the energy, the aggression, the animated + abusive send-offs, howsoever integral, natural, and 'necessary' they might seem to be to him, they pale in comparison to the classy and impeccable conduct of Kane.

I certainly believe that Kohli has no ill-will or personal grudge against anyone off-the-field but the reactions are in poor taste when you think whether such a person/cricketer (let alone a captain) can be a role model for the next generation. Great batsman yes, works for him yes, but do I want to advocate that as the way to be for others? I personally don't think so at all.

No coincidence then, that India is now a much fitter and more aggressive team under Kohli. On the other hand, Kane's team has one or two aggro folks but even they never cross the line and it is also largely thanks to Kane that the Kiwi team reflects its unflappable captain cool's personality. 

There's been a lot of talk about how NZ had an unfair advantage in that the conditions suited them - true. 

They even enjoyed the invaluable edge of having played two Tests just prior to the Big Final in English conditions - yes, tick that one too. 

It's also true that they had a much easier road to the final, having played mostly at home and not having had to scrap for wins like India did in Australia against Australia despite historic setbacks and adversities.

And credit to India, we never complained or gave any excuses either.

Even Shastri or Kohli asking for a three-match final is justified and not a case of sour grapes. But by the same logic, should we then not apply the same rule before we celebrate 1983 - our win exactly 38 years ago as I write this today on June 25?

Even the more optimistic Indian would concede that had the finals been a best-of-three, India would have struggled to be World Champions then. And obviously, we know of many other winners too who could have lost to their opponent, had it been a three-match result.

So why complain now, especially in Tests where even over a 5-day period there are enough twists and turns? I am all for a best-of-three too but how do we schedule it? How do we stall the already crammed international cricket calendar and ask team to park one month of valuable time for the eventuality of them being in the finals for 15 possible days of cricket (excluding recovery breaks required in between)?

And even if we imagine that this does happen, atleast one of the three Tests could still get rained out or hampered by various factors like the weather, the pitch or the conditions favoring one finalist more than the other. What happens if we can have only 2 matches with 0-0 or 1-1? One might still crib what was the point then. A team might say there were unfair advantages to one finalist due to any factor like weather or toss or anything else too So while in an ideal world, it would be great to have three matches, I suspect even then, it might not be able to guarantee to a world where everyone will be happy for sure.

So let's make the big day count, till we find a better option. And let's not forget, how New Zealand behaved after the tied final, which they eventually lost in the 2nd Super Over! In a World Cup final! 

So while Kohli has not said anything wrong, let's remember how Kane and NZ behaved when they lost the way he did in the World Cup final. I still remember that even at the height of dejection, how Kane remained so graceful and calm without making any statements about rules and the cruel hand that fate dealt to him.

And therein, lies the greatness and likeability of Kane and New Zealand. Which is also why, they remain almost every no-Kiwi citizen's second-favorite team (right after the person's home nation team).

Well done, India and New Zealand - despite all the rains, despite all the delays, you put up a spectacle worth watching and it was quite fitting to get a championship winner on the last hour of the last (6th) day's play. 

In the end, as I said, the picture of Kohli and Kane says it all. Well done, more power to Test Cricket, and more power to both India and New Zealand!