A tale of two series: From awesome to awful

With due respects to Bangladesh, despite coming off a series win, actually a historic whitewash of Pakistan in Pakistan, beating them in India was more amazing because of how we beat not only them but also the weather gods and won - not because of but in spite of the overhead conditions, especially in Kanpur.

Alas, all that seems a distant memory now, after the whitewash we got - yes, we got whitewashed at home - that too, by a team without any Trent Boult or Kane Williamson, and that had just been walloped 2-0 by Sri Lanka in similar, subcontinental conditions. 

Given the contrasting form and fortunes of both the teams, no one would have expected to see what unfolded in the next fifteen days. 

We all know now what happened. Let's take a look at the possible reasons at the why behind the result:

1. Pitch Conditions and Home Advantage

A critical factor in India's loss was the pitch conditions. Traditionally, India has leveraged spin-friendly pitches to its advantage, banking on its world-class spinners to dominate the opposition. However, in this series, the pitch conditions seemed to have backfired.

Impact of Rank Turners

• Early Wear and Tear: Rank turners deteriorate quickly, leading to unpredictable and uneven bounce. While this theoretically benefits spinners, it also brings opposition spinners into play, neutralizing India's traditional strength.
• Opposition Adaptability: New Zealand spinners, such as Ajaz Patel and Mitchell Santner, adapted brilliantly to these conditions, often outperforming their Indian counterparts and neutralizing the anticipated home advantage India usually enjoys.

Strategic Miscalculations

• Team Selection: India’s selection strategy seemed ill-suited to the conditions. Opting for three spinners on surfaces that offered inconsistent turn meant that the balance of the team was compromised. The reliance on spinners in conditions that didn’t exclusively favor them allowed New Zealand’s seamers to exploit the conditions better.

2. New Zealand's Superior Planning and Execution

New Zealand’s meticulous planning and flawless execution were significant contributors to their series win. From analyzing pitch conditions to understanding player weaknesses, their preparation was thorough and effective.

Tailored Bowling Plans

• Exploiting Indian Weaknesses: New Zealand’s bowlers executed plans that specifically targeted Indian batsmen’s weaknesses. Short-pitched deliveries troubled Indian batsmen, who are traditionally more comfortable against spin.
• Seam and Swing Mastery: On pitches that offered variable bounce, New Zealand's bowlers effectively used seam and swing to their advantage, unsettling the Indian batsmen who struggled to adjust to these variations.

Field Placements and Defensive Strategies

• Aggressive Field Placements: New Zealand captain Tom Latham set aggressive fields that applied constant pressure on the Indian batsmen. The close-in fielders and strategic placements disrupted India's scoring rhythms and induced mistakes.
• Defensive Fortitude: Their defensive strategies, particularly in handling India’s spinners, were exemplary. Batsmen like Rachin Ravindra and Will Young showcased remarkable resilience, playing with soft hands and rotating the strike to negate the spinners' impact.

3. Batting Collapses and Inconsistencies

India’s batting lineup, traditionally a bastion of strength, showed uncharacteristic vulnerabilities throughout the series. Inconsistent performances and batting collapses played a crucial role in the series outcome.

Top Order Failures

• Early Wickets: The Indian top order consistently failed to provide solid starts. Early dismissals of key players like Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill put immense pressure on the middle order.
• Technical Deficiencies: Technical deficiencies, particularly against seam and swing, were exposed. The inability to counter the lateral movement led to frequent dismissals, destabilizing the batting lineup.

Middle Order Struggles

• Inexperienced Middle Order: The middle order, comprising relatively inexperienced players, couldn’t withstand the pressure. The lack of partnerships and frequent wickets in clusters prevented India from posting competitive totals.
• Shot Selection: Poor shot selection at crucial junctures, often precipitated by the pressure of scoreboard stagnation, resulted in quick wickets and furthered the batting woes.

4. Bowling Inefficiencies

While India’s bowling attack is renowned for its potency, several inefficiencies surfaced during the series, undermining their effectiveness.

Inconsistent Spinners

• Lack of Penetration: India's spinners struggled to find consistent penetration on pitches that were expected to favor them. The over-reliance on spin, without adequate support from the pacers, rendered the attack one-dimensional.
• Control and Discipline: Spinners like Ravindra Jadeja and Ravichandran Ashwin were not as effective as usual, often lacking the control and discipline required to tie down the New Zealand batsmen.

Pace Bowling Challenges

• Injury Concerns: Injuries to key pacer Mohammad Shami affected the balance and depth of the bowling attack. Siraj, despite his efforts, was largely ineffective throughout the series.
• Execution Under Pressure: In pressure situations, the Indian pacers failed to execute their plans effectively. The inability to deliver under crunch moments allowed New Zealand to build partnerships and accumulate runs steadily.

5. Psychological Factors and Momentum Shifts

Cricket is as much a mental game as it is a physical one. Psychological factors and momentum shifts played a significant role in determining the series outcome.

Pressure of Expectations

• Home Series Pressure: Playing at home brings immense pressure and expectations. The Indian team seemed to buckle under this pressure, leading to uncharacteristic mistakes and lapses in concentration.
• Mental Fatigue: Continuous cricket, bio-bubbles, and the mental fatigue of a packed calendar seemed to have taken a toll on the players. This was evident in the fielding lapses and moments of indecision during crucial phases of the game.

Momentum and Confidence

• New Zealand’s Confidence: Winning the first Test gave New Zealand the momentum and confidence to dominate the series. They capitalized on this psychological edge, consistently putting India on the back foot.
• Shifting Momentum: Key moments, such as dropped catches and missed run-out opportunities, allowed New Zealand to shift the momentum in their favor. These critical junctures often dictated the overall flow of the matches.

6. Leadership and Tactical Decisions

Leadership and on-field tactical decisions also played a pivotal role in the series outcome. The contrasting captaincy styles of Rohit Sharma and Tom Latham had a discernible impact on the series dynamics.

Tom Latham’s Captaincy

• Strategic Acumen: Latham’s strategic acumen and calm demeanor were crucial in navigating through challenging phases. His ability to inspire and extract the best from his players was evident throughout the series.
• Field Placements and Bowling Changes: Latham’s proactive field placements and timely bowling changes kept the Indian batsmen under constant pressure, often leading to crucial breakthroughs.

Rohit Sharma’s Captaincy

• Aggressive Approach: While Sharma’s aggressive approach is often a strength, it occasionally backfired in this series. Over-attacking fields and frequent bowling changes sometimes allowed the New Zealand batsmen to settle and capitalize on loose deliveries.
• Pressure Management: Sharma’s management of pressure situations could have been better. Instances of frustration and visible agitation on the field might have impacted the team’s overall composure and performance.

Player Availability and Injuries

• Key Absences: The absence of key players due to injuries significantly weakened the team. Missing experienced campaigners like Mohammad Shami and Hardik Pandya deprived India of crucial match-winners.
• Impact of New Zealand's Full Strength: In contrast, New Zealand fielded a full-strength team with all their key players available, giving them a distinct advantage in terms of experience and skill.

Introspect but move on now!

The series loss to New Zealand was a culmination of several factors that collectively tipped the scales against India. From strategic miscalculations and player performances to psychological pressures and external influences, every aspect contributed to the final result. While it is essential to acknowledge New Zealand’s superior planning and execution, it is equally important for India to introspect and address the identified weaknesses. By doing so, India can regain their dominance in future series and continue to uphold their proud cricketing legacy. Let's look ahead now and put our best foot forward in the Tests that await us Down Under. Jai Ho!